Another suggestion - perhaps there would be a way to detect the status of the PRI itself, perhaps monitoring and/or returning the performance registers on the PRI interface.
Rationale: if the PRI is seeing lots of errors (or an LOS), then we could fail-over to a physical line (FXO) or another PRI. Just an idea... Ron Gage On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 18:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yes, it is a zap channel. That would be great! > > Wouldn't it make more sense if ZapIsAvail is true to continue at > priority+1? That way if it isn't available (busy) it works like the > Dial app and goes to priority+101. > > Dave > > On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 01:59 PM, James Golovich wrote: > > > What type of channel are you trying to do this for? I was thinking of > > writing an app ZapIsAvail, that would check if a certain zap channel > > is in > > use and if so continue on with priority+1, otherwise jump to > > priority+101 > > > > James > > > > > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> In the extensions.conf file, is there a way to detect if it is on hook > >> or off hook (without dialing it)? > >> > >> Dave > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Asterisk-Users mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Ron Gage - Saginaw, Michigan I am looking for work - resume at http://www.rongage.org/resume.doc Electrical Engineering, Linux Programming, Networking _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
