Jeremy McNamara ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>Can you be more specific on which features are not available in
>chan_h323 that are in asterisk-oh323?  I haven't been able to find anything.

I *think* that:
oh323 also acts as a h323 gatekeeper while chan_h323 does not
but ..
h323 supports all * codecs while oh323 does not

--
Brian Johnson

This is where my witty signature line would be if I bothered to edit this line :)


_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to