As far as I can find out (till now that is) all it actually takes (since
2001) is conforming to the R&TTE
As in
http://www.radio.gov.uk/topics/conformity/document/rtte/rtteman/rtteman.htm
Annex 4 states that An application for an Opinion should be accompanied by
(amongst others):
Version of any software or firmware supplied with the equipment
which may affect compliance with the R&TTE must be declared.
However, and thats the big difference since this R&TTE came into effect:
Unlike the previous Telecommunications Terminal Equipment Directive (TTE
Directive 91/263/EEC and 98/13/EC) in which each compliance procedure
included a third party continuing compliance element, there is no formal
third party continuing compliance requirement in Annex IV of the RTTE
Directive. However, the manufacturer does have a responsibility for ensuring
continuing compliance. This requirement is invoked by Annex II.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Underwood
Sent: donderdag 3 april 2003 18:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] CE certification for Europe
Unless things have simplified since I was last involved in European
approvals (which is quite a long time) things are worse than that. If
your factory has not previously produced approved telecoms products, you
probably need to pay for a factory inspection; each new protocol you
want to support needs its own approvals testing of the software; the
software drivers must be locked down against uncontrolled changes; your
own changes require some level of reapproval; etc. The list can get
quite long and painful, unless you are producing a series of products
and can get into the proper swing of things. If you only want CTR4 the
protocol list might not be a problem. On the driver side you can look at
the i4l stuff and see what they had to do to get a driver through
approvals for dumb BRI ISDN cards - and every tiny change means some
level of reapproval.
The US used to be comparable, but these days approval there may not even
be necessary. It depends how you read the rules. Approving the hardware
certainly makes life easier, though. Getting UL and FCC approval for the
hardware seems to be all that is needed. The protocols don't seem to
need any approvals.
The figures the original poster quoted seem much cheaper than any real
approval I have seen go through. It sounds like he hasn't been through
the approvals minefield before. It can be a slow and costly place to
navigate for the beginner.
Regards,
Steve
Klaus-Peter Junghanns wrote:
>Hi d hintion,
>
>hmmm...getting approvals for europe isnt that easy.
>because you get the approval for a combination of hardware
>and driver software, so when you change the driver you loose the
>approval.
>
>oh yes, sure you can produce the cards and sell them cheaper, but that
>doesnt take the development time of the zaptel drivers into account.
>opening up a competition against digium based on their software and
>GPLed hardware design doesnt sound good to me ..... rather sounds like
>M$ style to me.
>
>regards
>kapejod
>
>
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
