Are you sure that you compiled zaptel for __SMP__ ? Edit your zaptel/Makefile.
0: 75283844 75241320 75286285 75247088 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 1 0 1 1 IO-APIC-edge keyboard 2: 0 0 0 0 XT-PIC cascade 3: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level usb-ohci 8: 1 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc 15: 1 0 0 1 IO-APIC-edge ide1 16: 22134870 22120997 22135905 22122829 IO-APIC-level eth0 25: 4670 4548 4614 4518 IO-APIC-level tor2 All the four CPU's should have IRQ's like in the example above. Martin On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Alex Zarubin wrote: > Hi, > > We are trying to validate Asterisk as a media gateway PRI <-> SIP with two > T400P (8 T1s) per box. The first > experience with BOX1 (Compaq, 2.53 GHz, 1 Gb RAM) and just one T400P was > encouraging - on the load > test with 3 T1s worth of calls we had on average 75% idle CPU. > > Not so with BOX2 (Dell, single 2.6 GHz Xeon, 1 Gb RAM, 2 T400P) and BOX3 > (Dell, dual 2.6 GHz Xeon, > 2 Gb RAM, 2 T400P, asterisk/zaptel is built with SMP support). > > On the similar load test (as with the BOX1) BOX2 was showing 0% idle CPU 70% > of the time. Just 3 T1s > out of 8. > > On the load test with just 2 T1s BOX3 was very close to 0% idle on CPU0, > CPU1 was at 95% idle. > The process ksoftirqd_CPU0 was close to the top of the 'top', with > /proc/interrupts showing tor2 related > numbers growing very fast. We had 2 T1s plugged into the first T400P board, > with nothing going into the second, > but the number of interrupts for the both boards was growing at the same > pace. Here are the interrupts > (after the box reboot, so they are not that big as they were) - do they look > OK? > > > CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 > 0: 122556 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer > 1: 4 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge keyboard > 2: 0 0 0 0 XT-PIC cascade > 5: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level usb-ohci > 8: 1 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc > 12: 20 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge PS/2 Mouse > 14: 23 0 2 0 IO-APIC-edge ide0 > 20: 516930 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level tor2 > 24: 516524 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level tor2 > 28: 10600 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level eth0 > 29: 4837 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level eth1 > 30: 24831 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level aacraid > NMI: 0 0 0 0 > LOC: 122430 122429 122429 122428 > ERR: 0 > MIS: 0 > > Not sure what went wrong. Any suggestions on how to work with 2 T400P in a > box (without hurting performance) > and how to get advantage of SMP for Asterisk would be appreciated. > > Any known Linux kernel related issues (2.4.20-13.7smp #1 SMP for BOX3 )? > > Thank you. > > Alex Zarubin > > > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
