On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 12:57, Anthony Minessale wrote: > Lot's of possibilities........ perl likes to parse text more than > anything else > you could develop the config file parsing engine that way and go to > town making up a format rather than dealing with coding the parsing > and you can teach asterisk to read config files from different systems > etc. > maybe asterisk is the emacs of pbx systems (oh oh here come more > flames going off on a tangent) YES I like PERL! and EMACS!
Ahh, now we can understand your ailment ;) It has been brought up before, and I forgot to mention it in the TCL config debate, but the configs need to be small and able to not become bloated. We have developers here trying to put asterisk on embedded systems so that one day we might go to the store and buy a linksys router like phone switch for our home. Embedding perl into a core function like config means they must allocate resources such as storage for what all perl brings along with it. So a proposal for those who keep insisting on a separate config formats, What we might need is a directive that can be placed in the general section of the extension.conf file that acts like a extension, but is executed on start and reload. From there a system call could be generated or agi to set up the rest of the system. This makes an easy config method for those experimenting with new formats without cluttering the rest of the code base, or causing undue headache on our embedded friends. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
