I agree. Besides think of how much more marketable it would be if you could implement a solution for a client where they would be able to do some of the more simple changes on their own without incurring an expense. When they need real work done to their box then they'd call in the experts. Why must everyone criticize each others work so harshly. Why not just say, "hey nice gui" and keep their elitist comments to themselves.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Lambert Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:55:25PM -0400, Jeremy McNamara wrote: > So why not just open vi and bang out a conf file? How is a newbie > ever not gonna be a newbie with a GUI config? Why limit the range of configuration options? I mean, what about people who know vi sucks and emacs rules? Besides, wouldn't it be even better for the newbie to just fire up ex and bang out their own telephony application? It will match their requirements more closely. There is nothing wrong with lowering the bar to entry. When they run into things the GUI does not handle, they will be more likely to pop open a nedit window and find the effort worthwhile since they have already learned that Asterisk is worth having around. Or do you disagree with the concept of Linux distributions too? Wouldn't the newbie be better off downloading all the individual parts, from the FTP servers like we used to back in '92? Besides, if we are ever to have a fully configurable GUI, we will probably have to "suffer" along with a partial solution until someone who needs more flexibility and has the skills, enhances the existing tool. Besides, wouldn't it be in *your* best interest to volunteer to help fix up the GUI to make sure it is dead simple for a newbie to install a precompiled package, pop open a web browser and sign up for a /*your company here*/ account or twenty? You *can* still use vi when you make changes to your own configs. No-one wants to take that right away from you. > Good luck, your gonna need it, I disagree with your attitude. I hope for your sake, you don't take that attitude with your prospective customers. But hey! You are free to have your own personality. BTW, do you edit your sendmail.cf files directly? Or do you wuss out and edit sendmail.mc instead? BTW, it is not germane to my point that you may be running some other MTA instead. I prefer to run postfix myself. > Gary wrote: > > >I tend to agree with Steven on this... > > > >If the web form makes it easier for the "newbies" why not, its just > >another option.... > > > >It could even be expanded to be a dialplan for dunnies (woops, i > >meant > >dummies:-) interface.... > > > >Considering all it is, is an interface to write out a .conf file.... > > > >On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:04:28 -0700, Steven P. Donegan wrote: > > > > > > > >>I disagree - for many tasks a GUI would be just fine, for others > >>direct > >>coding would do the trick. They do not have to be mutually > >>exclusive. > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy > >>McNamara > >>Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:42 PM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk > >> > >> > >>That GUI is going to dramaticly limit the flexibility of your > >>config. The only way you can make a GUI config work with Asterisk is > >>if you have a very very specific task you want to accomplish, but > >>even then you still will have issues as your requirements change > >>with time. > >> > >>Stick with what the AstGod has bestowed upon us.... It will save you > >>many headaches. > >> > >> > >>Jeremy McNamara > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Dylan VanHerpen wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Hi everybody, > >>> > >>>I've been tinkering with a web based interface for Asterisk. I > >>>tried to stick as closely to the current configuration format as > >>>possible. The web interface should help to do things a little > >>>easier (sort by extension, context, do bulk changes). > >>> > >>>www.packetbell.com/asterisk > >>> > >>>Feedback appreciated! > >>> > >>>Dylan. > >>> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>> > >>> > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Asterisk-Users mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >> > >> > > > >. > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Asterisk-Users mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users