Also using the -p (real time option) to start asterisk, may also help.


James Taylor wrote:


Carlos, You may have something here.
Dan - you might try to connect via the virtual network adapter to your "host" machine's hard drive. (just map a drive) it could be that "networking" from your "VM" to the host is faster.
James Taylor


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Carlos Eduardo Cremon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Dan,

What type of "virtual harddisk" did you create in your linux vmware virtual machine? As far as I know, the default type is a kind of compressed harddisk image, to save disk space in the host machine. Perhaps that is the answer to have bad performance only in local services, opening local files in vmware: the overhead to decompress.

-Eduardo






Dan escreveu:




Nice!
If it can work without connecting it to the power supply, then will be
better..;-)
When we leave the home, I must disconnect from the mains EVERYTHING (the
alarm system and the HA PC are the only accepted exceptions)...

:-)))

Dan

----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Woodhead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Again Asterisk and VMWare - it works now!







Hey Dan,

Get a http://www.mini-itx.com/ and disguise it as a fruit bowl. She'll




never




know! I can't wait until someone builds one looking like a shoe or a




handbag




and then I can have them all over the house and the more I have, the




happier




the other half will be!!

W

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Again Asterisk and VMWare - it works now!



Roy,


Please do not give me such a solution.
I know how and where to buy or how to build a very cheap PC (I work in




this




field).
I now that this is a cheaper option (to buy or build a new pc), but I




don't




want another computer running 24/7 in my house.
It is so difficult to understand that?
I have a small flat with two rooms. I want to be able to sleep too in the
same house.
My wife for sure will not accept another one...

I feel that it can fully work on my config (allmost it does it now).

It is more challenging to make it work under those circumstances...;-)
Why to choose everytime the easiest solution available?
I want to do it for my ..soul...;-)

Best regards,
Dan
P.S. I have several PCs available for this, but.. I DON'T WANT TO USE




THEM!




----- Original Message ----- From: "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Again Asterisk and VMWare - it works now!







IIRC you were given URLs for all sorts of cheapo PCs. Perhaps you've got
an old P90 lying around? Or perhaps someone else has?

Use that!
Not vmware!
If you're to use vmware, do it the other way around - linux host with
vmware windoze guest. This works fine for me on my PC.

On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 08:49, Dan wrote:




Hi,

I have succeed using Asterisk on VMWare on an [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 128 MB
allocated for the Linux virtual machine.
I have connected this PBX with another one using IAX/GSM. I can call




the




other part and the sound is great, without any interruption.
The phone used is a Cisco7960 with G.711, so still a codec conversion




is




in




place (GSM/G.711) and Asterisk/VMWare Wkst performs very well.

The problem is only when I try to call local services, like echo test




or




Digium Demo. Then, the sound of the informative message for the Digium




Demo




is choppy, but the sound from the Digium server (after connection) is




very




good.

So.. the problem is only to play local files when in virtual machine




(menus,




informative messages, etc.). Why? It is clear that this is not a




computer




performance issue and/or a timing problem during the codec conversion.
More, the inband DTMF works like a charm under the virtual machine.




Even




the




known problem with double digits for Cisco phones dissapear.

BR,
Dan
P.S. Please do not answer again that this setup cannot work. In this




moment




I cannot accept such an answer.


_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users






_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




-- James Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] 903-793-1953

--
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to