H.323 is no longer part of my own network, so I no longer have a built in method to burn lots of time beating up a dying protocol and unfortunately, I have to dedicate myself to projects that directly generate revenue. I'll see what I can do, but I can make no promises.
Sorry,
Jeremy McNamara
P.S. I could not duplicate any crash using my own (proprietary) gatekeeper. Plus, I cannot do a thing without debug information.
Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
Great! Thanks, Michael. Jeremy, what do you think?
Michael
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 07:53 am, Michael Manousos wrote:
Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if there are any plans on adding secondary gatekeeper
support to asterisk h323 channel drivers.
Nice to have something like this. I 'll add it to the TODO features of asterisk-oh323.
Also I've noticed that chan_h323 is crashing asterisk at startup if primary gatekeeper is not available. Wouldn't it be a more correct behavior if it doesn't crashing but continue registration attempts inThere is no such problem with chan_oh323.
the background? Didn't test it with chan_oh323.
Thank you.Michael.
Michael
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
