Oh what would be nice,,,, think about this,, Come up with a browser based activex or something...
click here for video (forget about the audio for the moment...) client automatically dials into an asterisk one way video conference. Now that could be a great way of streaming video now later add some audio (preferably stereo) and turn asterisk into a multichannel internet tv station :-) Heck I am looking for a streaming mjpeg stream for a webcam (using a sony snc-rz30) via an intermediate server. Gary On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 22:04:34 -0700, Kim C. Callis wrote: >On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 18:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, John Todd wrote: >> >> > So, I keep seeing references in the codebase to "video conference" >> > uses for Asterisk. However, I am unaware of what end devices are >> > currently supported by Asterisk. >> > >> > Searching through the archives for the term "video", I see a few >> > other people have asked the same question, with no real reply. >> > Nobody, it seems, has actually tested any video phones on Asterisk >> > other than perhaps the folks at Digium. If I am mistaken in this >> > assertion, please reply to this note with a URL for the equipment or >> > software you're using that is commercially available. >> > >> > Messenger XP? Anyone have instructions? (sorry, I don't have Windows >> > at my location, so I can't test.) >> > >> > The 8x8 DV325 phone? There is no price or "buy this now" button on >> > their site, which points me towards the trail of vaporware. >> > >> > Others? >> >> John, I do remember getting gnophone up and running with a webcam using a >> standard kernel module ov511, but that was back in elden days and may not >> hold true anymore. It did also send the picture through to the farend >> gnophone. As far as hardware is concerned, I'd say anything that's >> supported by video4linux should be passable through. Ofcourse, this was >> with IAX and format_jpeg.so >> >> -- >> wasim learns to bottom-post > >And the gnophone is a good solution if it strictly a Linux only >environment. But it does absolutely nothing for a Windows environment, >which is the type of environment that most people are asking about the >video conference ability. > >Personally, I don't want to talk to people, hence I am not really big on >video. Meetme rooms work for me, and I can be dressed accordinly (or >not) and pick my nose and things of that nature. But people love their >technology, and would rather look at someone on the screen at a whopping >3 frames per a second, as opposed to talking in the meetroom... Go >figure! > >Kim C. Callis > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
