> another. I mean, by the time you strip down the linux install to make it > rock-stable, it's basically a kernel, compiler, and a handful of > dependances. Does it really matter what OS it runs on at this point, as > long as it's a robust kernel?
At least in my case, I /can/ strip down a FreeBSD (or a picobsd release) install to its required components in a matter of minutes. I keep up with the latest security issues and major bugs. It's a must for my daily job. I track -stable and I'm watching -current when I can. I feel comfortable with keeping FreeBSD secure. To do this with Linux, I have to start over. I have an entirely different set of problems to keep track of, an unfamiliar..eh..release process, etc. If I worked in a Solaris or IRIX shop, I'd similarly prefer to run the system in an environment closer to the "usual" working environment. Just my thoughts. :) ...david --- david raistrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
