thanks, I'll try. Question: asterisk always manages RTP flow also with chan_h323?

Andrea

Steven Thomas wrote:





Hi,

I use Asterisk as a SIP <-> H323 translator without any issues after
switching to chan_h323.

My environment is:

SIP (7960) -> Asterisk -> GnuGK (h323) -> Cisco 2600 H323 Gateway to PSTN.

This works well without the CPU load seen with oh323.  The call control
also seems far better using chan_h323.  I have no delay either.

I use a smaller box: PII 200, 64Mb RAM. RedHat 9.

Only 4 handsets - 2 SIP IP 7960's, 2 Analog H323 via the Cisco router FXS
ports.

I also have configured Asterisk on another site to act as a H323 gateway
for PSTN calls into a Cisco Call Manager via gnuGK - H323 also.

I would suggest trying chan_h323 as an alternative.....



Regards,

Steven Thomas


Technical Project Manager Network & Connectivity Services, IBM Australia

Ph: 0404 099 262
NH011, IBM Centre, St Leonards, 2065
Internet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit us at http://www.ibm.com/services/au/its



andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: To: "" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: .digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] delay problem in h323 10-09-03 08:24 AM Please respond to asterisk-users



yes, I agree with you.
I verify with a sniffer and asterisk manages RTP flows. The problem is
asterisk
decode and then code again RTP flows. This function requires 5-7% CPU On my

test-box (Linux rh 7.3 on P3 600 GHz). This solution  don't scale without
dedicated
HW, I think!

Another problem is codec supported: ok for G.711, G.729. I don't know for
GSM
BUT: what about video codec? what about proprietary codec or ciphered
codec?

Do you have any suggestion on how I can manage this with asterisk? I'm very

interested into asterisk as sip-to-h323 translator.
Thanks

Andrea


Quoting Steven Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:







The only way I was able to solve my delay issue with Chan_oh323 was to
switch to Chan_h323.

Chan_oh323 caused a similar 3 -4 sec delay on one way of the

conversation.


Checking the CPU stats on asterisk during the call - confirms that the

RTP


stream was somehow routing through asterisk - not sure why!



Regards,

Steven Thomas







andrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


                     Sent by:                          To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:


                     .digium.com                       Subject:  Re:
[Asterisk-Users] delay problem in h323





10-09-03 12:45 AM


Please respond to


asterisk-users







Hi all,


is it possible to disable RTP routing through asterisk? RTP routing is a
very nice feature but, I think it’s important also to disable it in some
cases (e. g. in a LAN).
Do you have any suggestion?

Andrea

Rattana BIV wrote:


Hi,

I have a delay between two H323.

Netmeeting1 --------- |            |
                            | gnuGK | ----------- [asterisk-oh323]----
| Asterisk |
Netmeeting2 ----------|            |

Netmmeting 1 call Netmeeting 2. When Netmmeting 1 speak Netmeeting 2
receive the voice without delay. But in the other way I have 3 secondes
delay.
In oh323.conf  I set jittermin and jittermax to 20, the ipTos=lowdelay.
I try to find where I can delete the delay.
Does anyone have a tip ?


Best Regards Rattana




_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Ë^®+$RÇ«²f¢–)à–+-

zž¬’ë®





--------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through CSP Webmail System

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
?^?+$Rǫ?f??)?+-?^?+$Rǫ?X???b?+?r????��?X???b?+?r?????????+-?w??-z????rs==



_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to