[message re-ordered]


----- Original Message -----
From: "Paulo Mannheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 4:32 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SIP busy


Hi,

 I would like * to treat a SIP extension as a normal extension, when it
 comes to the busy functionality. In other words, if someone tries to
 call the SIP phone and there is already an ongoing conversation, the new
 caller should get a busy message/tone

 Is there any parameter that I can set? Is this something that should be
 configured at my softphone?

Best,

> PHM

Basically you need to disable call waiting on your SIP device (if it
supports call waiting to begin with).  When the second call comes into the
SIP device with call waiting disabled, it should send a 486 SIP message
(mine says "486 Busy Here") back to the Asterisk. You can see this in "sip
debug" mode on the console.

Then setup your extensions.conf to take the appropriate action on Busy like
any other extension.

Sean
_______________________________________________

Sean Robertson

NETXUSA
p. 800-289-6389
f.  864-233-4344                  "Ask me about Voice over IP."
http://www.netxusa.com/

Another method would simply be to keep a call counter for existing calls, and increment it/decrement it when calls are made and then hung up. Put a short GotoIf before your Dial statement to check if the line is "occupied" and then reject the call if that is the case.



[test] exten => 1234,1,DBGet(STATUS=${EXTEN}/OFFHOOK) exten => 1234,2,SetVar(CALLEDNUMBER=${EXTEN}) exten => 1234,3,GotoIf($[${STATUS} = 1}]?106:3) exten => 1234,4,DBPut(${EXTEN}/OFFHOOK=1) exten => 1234,5,Dial(SIP/1234,20) exten => 1234,6,DBPut(${EXTEN}/OFFHOOK=0) exten => 1234,7,Voicemail2(u1234) exten => 1234,106,DBPut(${EXTEN}/OFFHOOK=0) exten => 1234,107,Voicemail2(b1234)

exten => h,1,DBPut(${CALLEDNUNMBER}/OFFHOOK=0)
exten => h,2,Hangup




JT _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to