> On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 14:41 -0500, Brian West wrote: > > chan_woomera is another alternative h323 implementation. > Without being rude, why do we need another one? ie, why did you decide > that another one needed to be written, what are the advantages (and > dis-advantages) ?? I think maybe you are missing the power of chan_woomera it leverages the OPAL framework, so any protocol that is implemented in opal with now automagic into asterisk, h323 just happens to be the first protocol in that suite... ( think unicall as zaptel replacement as well :)
another advantage is licensing issues woomera is a tcp socket protocol so you could potentially use commercial implementations of channels and or codecs in asterisk w/o the dual lic/gpl issue for channels driver linked direct to * header files.. IMHO the biggest benefit, is it will allow down the road abstraction of the channels from the core PBX switch functions which is realy hurting scalability with * current channel driver design _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
