Matthew Boehm wrote:
We are interested in how other people are handling NAT problems. We
have several customers all of which have some sort of firewall/NAT
device at their location. For simplicity sake, all customers' internal
networks are 192.168.*.*.
Our asterisk box is on public IP not blocked by any FW/NAT.
I use QUALIFY=yes on all our customers' phones and I feel that sending
out 80-something keep-alive packets is causing our box to crawl and
cause bad calls.
Would SER be better in this case? Should I have phones register with
SER instead of with Asterisk?
Matthew,
We use SER for user registration and NAT Keep Alives. It can handle
thousands of messages per second without skipping a beat. I am pretty
sure that Asterisk is not too happy about receiving all your keep alives:)
Thanks,
Matthew
--
Andres
Network Admin
http://www.telesip.net
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
