>Probably you are only looking for results of FXO cards, but maybe it's >usefull:
Any results that folks can supply are useful. Thankyou for giving ztclock a try. This information is certainly helpful. >483328 samples in 60.416004 sec. (483329 sample intervals) 99.999794% >483328 samples in 60.416000 sec. (483328 sample intervals) 100.000000% >483328 samples in 60.416004 sec. (483329 sample intervals) 99.999794% >Estimate 8 frame slips every 483.328003 seconds. I assume that your system is clocking from the BRI rather than from the TDM card. Is that correct? It looks to me like you have a perfect clock source that is 100% accurate. I would guess that the slight deviation of 4 microseconds in two of the results is likely accounted for as a percentage of error in the test itself. In reality, I'm sure that you are not seeing any slips at all. I'll be compiling any results that I receive in order to try to improve the accuracy of the test. > >No CPU spikes afaics. > >Card: >Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO >Module 1: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO >Module 2: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO >Module 3: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO >Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F (4 modules) >I run a fax on it, this works. But this is FXS. I have ISDN lines >outgoing with the junghanns quadBRI. Do you have fax machines connected to the FXS ports, or are you running something like spandsp? _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
