On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Paul Fielding wrote: > I have indeed already done so - I use G729 quite a bit since I travel alot > in adverse conditions. Interesting thing is, I can get less choppy audio > sometimes from my Vonage device using (what I suspect to be) Ulaw, while > either ulaw or G729 will still give choppy response at that moment from my > Linksys.... > > Paul
Funny thing about codecs.. Sometimes you will get better quality audio and less chop when using ulaw on crappy connections. Why? Very simply because it sends less total audio information per packet, so it can withstand dropped packets a lot better than a highly compressed codec, especially with a good jitter buffer and PLC implementation on the other side. I'd expect that Vonage is running something with a decent PLC and Jitter buffer, which would explain your results. Try using CVS head and enabling the SIP jitter buffer and PLC code w/ Ulaw and see if it improves your results. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
