> >What about define those phones on the SIP.conf and use sip, instead of IAX. > >That protocol use be more used to communicate Asterisk servers more than > >phones. That's not totally true. An IAX softphone will work easily behind a NAT/Firewall. The same can't be said for a SIP one. I've tested IAX succesfully working behind 3 NAT, and all the 4 softphones where able to place/receive calls. I really don't think you could do the same with SIP.
> Ah - ok - I understood from the docs that IAX was better and, as the > phone was capable of both, I've been trying to get it going via IAX. My opinion is to keep using IAX, because, like you concluded, it's a better protocol. hth _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
