Jim Archer wrote:
--On Monday, July 11, 2005 12:02 AM -0400 Michael Stearne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AT&T Natural voices seem to be pretty good. You can hear samples here:
http://www.wizzardsoftware.com/att_desktop.php . The Rich voice I
think sounds the best. They are a little better than the Cepstral
voices. But the Cepstral voices are vey good also.
Wow, those do sound good. I agree Rich seems to be the best. Thanks
very much. For $300, I might just get it to play with...
Alberto doesn't sound too hot. I can't imagine a native Spanish speaker
would be able to understand much of what he said--in my case I had
listened to the English speakers first, and knew what he was going to say!
MHO is that the Cepstral voices aren't as choppy. I have been using
Cepstral's Frank voice with Asterisk for quite a while, and overall it's
a pretty high-functioning machine voice.
I would rate it higher than the ones I just listened to on the AT&T site.
B.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
