On Tuesday 12 July 2005 20:02, Patrick Friedel wrote: > And you may need to set firmware_interval (that might be a 360 only > option), which is scaled in (minutes? seconds? Seconds with a minimum of > 60? Whatever it is, it's _incredibly_ sticky.). I guess for me the > next question is whether there is a more user-friendly way of forcing > the updates? I've got the chain set up, it rebooted and found the new
You can send a NOTIFY to the phone with 'Event: check-sync', to tell the phone it should re-read its settings. If the settings contain a new firmware, and the phone is set to auto-update it should (see below) update to the new firmware automatically. > firmware nicely enough, but the only change it did was indicate on the > phone that there was a new firmware available on the status line - it > didn't actually load the new firmware until the EU asked for it. No > biggie in my SOHO (3 whole phones!), but in a huge rollout I could see > that being really annoying. That is probably related to what Bob already described: we inserted a protection against upgrading the firmware during a running call. Unfortunately this protection was a little bit to strong. With firmware 3.60f or later this should not happen any more. Regards Nils Ohlmeier -- snom technology AG Gradestr. 46 D-12347 Berlin Nils Ohlmeier mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.snom.com _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
