Chris A. Icide wrote: > Note however, that in the unsolicited NOTIFY that Asterisk sends for > MWI, it includes a ;tag= as part of the NOTIFY. This will break some > devices as they will not accept the NOTIFY because the tag doesn't match > any transaction that is open. The correct way to send an unsolicited > NOTIFY would be without the tag altogether.
That's interesting. Any suggestions on such a device? I haven't seen that. I guess if they do that, it's ok, since sending unsolicited NOTIFY is theoretically wrong anyway. If the phone software wants to support it, they wouldn't bother with the tag, I guess. /O _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
