On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 04:52:43AM -0700, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 07:36 -0400, Doug Lytle wrote:
> > Just a guess, your simlink is pointing to the incorrect linux source > > directory. Go into /usr/src/linux and do a ls -l, see where the linux > > simlink is pointing to. If it's incorrect, then do a rm linux and > > delete it. Recreate with a ln -s /usr/src/yourlinuxversionhere ln -s localname /usr/src/linux Avoid absolute symlinks if you don't have to. > > and watch linus himself rant about how this is incorrect to do (yet all > the distros do it) :P If all the distros do it, then maybe it's not such a bad idea. Reminds me of Linus' rant about /usr/include/linux which wasn't exactly valid either. IMHO, the aptel build system is wrong here. It makes a number of (different) assumptions as to where the source resides . Sometimes it is /usr/src/linux , sometimes its the target of /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build I've fixed those in my local version and I build it vs a number of different kernel trees with no problem at all. Debian, for once, does not symlink /usr/src/linux for you. There should really be no need. It also provides nice "kernel-headers" packages, that should include everything you need from the configured kernel tree to build modules against. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
