|
With that setup context2 is part of
context1, which is a part of context3, so yeah, you have no security. What you need is something like this: [context1] ;List your sip users here [context2] ;Media gateway [context3] ;Inbound calls start here Include => context1 [context4] ;dialout context that allows trusted
extensions to dial out as well as call each other --start your sip phones here Include => context1 Include => context2 From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damon Estep In the example below context2 is included in context3
because it is included in context1. Is there a way to include context2 in context1, and context1
in context3, but not context2 in context3 as a result. [Context1] ;sip users with 10 digit extensions Include => context2 [context2] ;media gateway terminating local 10 digit calls [context3] ;inbound PRI via media gateway Include => context1 I have a case where a dialplan is insecure because inbound
calls in context3 can be re-routed back out in context2. Actually, what occurs
is a loop, where the call comes in context3, finds no match in context1,
egresses in context2, and repeats the loop, setting up a lot of calls in a
short period of time! Extensions in context1 need to be able to reach extensions
in context2 Inbound calls into context3 need to be able to reach
extensions in context1 Inbound calls in context3 MUST be restricted from reaching
extensions in context2 which are outside extensions sent out to a SIP provider. It would seem more logical and secure if includes did not
cascade, or would not make 2 “hops” Perhaps I have failed to understand some simple concept that
would resolve this issue? |
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
