I second that motion. I have a 500, and recently picked up a 300 and
wish I would have bought another 500 instead :-(
I felt that since I didn't need a speakerphone, the 300 would be fine.
The phone itself is smaller, and the LCD really sucks in comparison. As
for voice quality, they both are great - and even though there is no mic
on the 300, there is still a speaker - so you can do things like check
your voicemail and put the hanset in the cradle while on hold, etc (in
this way, its even better than the lame speakerphones on cheap voip
units - no echo can to get in the way).
Just my HO ;-)
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The screen on the 301 is crap. I would definitely advise paying the
extra for a 501.
Jim Duda wrote:
...
Is this a good quality phone? Or, is the 501 worth the added expense?
I believe the only real differences between 301 and 501 are that the
501 has
one additional line (total of 3) and has speaker phone capability.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
