I doubt my cvs was that current so... It's a clena install then... |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Kevin P. Fleming |Sent: Domingo, 28 de Agosto de 2005 09:56 p.m. |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.0 Beta1 | |Anton Krall wrote: |> I upgraded from cvs head 1.0.x which in my case was cvs head about 2 |> months ago. | |There is no such thing as "cvs head 1.0.x". You could mean 'CVS v1-0" |(whatever was current in the 1.0.x branch at the time) or 'CVS HEAD' |(the current development branch at the time). | |> Do you recommend doing a clean install vs. installing on top? | |Unless you were running a recent CVS HEAD already, yes, a |clean install is a good idea. |_______________________________________________ |--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- | |Asterisk-Users mailing list |[email protected] |http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users | |
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
