Linux asterisk.dnv.org 2.6.9-11.EL #1 Fri May 20 18:17:57 EDT 2005 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Rock solid so far, albeit in a pilot environment.....
Regards,
--
Anthony Rodgers
Business Systems Analyst
District of North Vancouver
Web: http://www.dnv.org
RSS Feed: http://www.dnv.org/rss.asp
On Aug 31, 2005, at 10:42 AM, canuck15 wrote:
I was wondering what peoples thoughts are about this. It seem that *
works just as well on Linux 2.6 as 2.4. Maybe a few small issues here
and there but generally it seems to me that * is just as stable on
either platform. 2.4 is the obvious choice for the highest
possiblility of a stable well tested environment but 2.6 seems to have
some enticing benefits.
Can Linux 2.6 be considered a viable choice now a days for someone
looking for a well tested stable production environment even though it
is not as well tested as 2.4
(yet!). _______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
