Brian Capouch wrote:
Robert Geller wrote:
What should I be looking for in /proc/interrupts? If the first field
in each row is the IRQ, I don't see any of the same numbers listed,
so would that mean there are no conflicts?
Why don't you include the output in your mail?
B.
CPU0
0: 79766966 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 41185 IO-APIC-edge i8042
7: 2 IO-APIC-edge parport0
8: 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
12: 444472 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 213361 IO-APIC-edge ide0
15: 876060 IO-APIC-edge ide1
169: 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd
177: 61956 IO-APIC-level Intel 82801BA-ICH2, eth2
185: 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd
193: 2 IO-APIC-level ohci1394
201: 2008201 IO-APIC-level eth0
NMI: 0
LOC: 79777609
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
Interesting. Eth0 is my wired LAN interface and eth2 is my wireless LAN
interface. Usually, I disable the wireless for obvious reasons (it's
installed only because I previously had a wireless solution when I
couldn't wire the house, but I recently did so I now have wired), but
now that it /and/ eth0 are enabled, I don't know which one applications
are using! It's quite possible that the softphone is using eth2, which
would probably cause problems as you previously mentioned.
Well, I disabled eth2 -- since I don't use/want to use it anyway -- with
ifconfig eth2 down, but /proc/interrupts still shows the same entry for
eth2 sharing the interrupt, which, as you and Rich said, isn't good.
Perhaps I should disable eth2, reboot, and see what /proc/interrupts is
then, along with how the softphone sounds?
Note that I can listen to streaming music and other files perfectly
fine--does this still apply?
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
