Ben, That is the correct choice for an Asterisk box. good luck.
Ben Brown wrote:
Thanks for the replys. I'm
convinced. PRI it is.
Peter Svensson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Ben Brown wrote:
So the only difference with PRI is caller ID? What I am trying to
determine is if the PRI has enough advantages to give up the voice
channel used by the D channel. For what I am doing, caller ID is not
necessarily that important for my application.
The PRI signalling is more robust than any of the alternatives (except
SS7). Call setup is faster, you can get DID, caller id and much better
error reporting from the pstn.
I would recommend against CAS or analoge connectes whenever isdn is
available.
Can Asterisk choose the context based upon the CallerID with a PRI?
Yes, this can be acclomplished in the dialplan.
Peter
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users