Ben, That is the correct choice for an Asterisk box. good luck.

Ben Brown wrote:
Thanks for the replys. I'm convinced. PRI it is.

Peter Svensson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Ben Brown wrote:

  
So the only difference with PRI is caller ID? What I am trying to 
determine is if the PRI has enough advantages to give up the voice 
channel used by the D channel. For what I am doing, caller ID is not 
necessarily that important for my application.
    

The PRI signalling is more robust than any of the alternatives (except 
SS7). Call setup is faster, you can get DID, caller id and much better 
error reporting from the pstn.

I would recommend against CAS or analoge connectes whenever isdn is 
available. 

  
Can Asterisk choose the context based upon the CallerID with a PRI?
    

Yes, this can be acclomplished in the dialplan.

Peter

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

  

_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to