The last time I checked, the Snom 200's were so out-tasked by the G.729 implementation on them that their U.I. became non-responsive during the call... Serious performance issues there. They may have come up with a clever fix, but it's been a while since I've looked into it... At the time, what I saw was scary.
Matt Hardeman PaperSoft ----- Original Message ----- From: "WipeOut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] G729 experiences.. > Matthew Hardeman wrote: > > >It's ok... The voice sounds fine. It's superior to most cell phone > >calls, anyway. > > > >I've used it with the Cisco 7960's without any trouble. > > > >You can use asterisk in any way that uses it in console mode. Safe > >asterisk does so, so you can use it. This may be otherwise fixed, but > >I'm not sure. As safe asterisk works, I don't worry about it. > > > >Voicemail will use one license for each output stream it has to > >transcode. Therefore, it is preferable if you are using G729 to only > >write out one format of voicemail recording. I use WAV49, which is > >small like GSM, but easier to play on default windows installs with any > >kind of decent media player installed. It *does* properly release the > >license when done. (At least now, on my system, it does.) > > > >Matt Hardeman > >PaperSoft > > > > > > > Has anyone used the Digim G.729 codec with SNOM 200 phones? > > I have heard people have had success with the Grandstream phones.. > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
