--- "Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It _IS_ true, the code that does that work was even > recently improved.
Keven, True, my mistake. I had 2 asterisk boxes, one running ver 1.0.7 and the other running 1.2.0-beta1. The log I posted before was from the 1.0.7, when I looked at the log of the other box (1.2.0-beta1), it was perfectly fine. Thank you for pointing this out. __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users