I am noticing that Zaptel will sometimes not have enough time to load all the way at bootup. If load by hand 'service zaptel start' then it loads just fine. I am running zaptel 1.2.0Beta1 on FC4 2.6.13-1. Since this is inconsistent I have not found a way around this yet.

-However -

On this same machine I am running swappable drives with CVS HEAD on one with FC4 2.6.13 (so the hardware is the same) and am not having any Zaptel issues at all.

-Scott





----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Cotton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 4:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2.6.13 zaptel incompability?


On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 12:11 +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>> i heard some talk about something in zaptel is currently incompatible
>> with 2.6.13.
>> is this so?
>> if so, will this be fixed soon?
>>
>
> zaptel 1.0.9.2's release notes has something about 2.6.13 kernels.

I was thinking more about the CVS HEAD version

My machines are totally CVS HEAD and have been running 2.6.13.x without
problems. At the moment they are running 2.6.14-rc4 also without any
problem. I _never_ use the distribution's kernel they are all from
kernel.org.


--
Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to