Hello All ,
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Phil Pritchard wrote:
> > > only new to asterisk, but have had some hardware exp.....
> > > stay away from irq9 its tied to irq2 and will always be shared, Paul
> > > has
> > > the go.. in bios disable serial and or usb (if not using) and make sure
> > > irda
> > > is not enabled. another one is the lpt port if your not using that, there
> > > is
> > > another irq you can steel..
> > ALL & I mean all serial/parrallel/...'everything I can find'... has
> > been
> > turned off in the bios . And I have recompiled a kernel with those
> > same
> > items turned off in it . That d??ned module wants to load at irq 9 no
> > matter what I do . Of course there is no way to set irq's to a
> > particular pci slot in the bios .
> > Does anyone now howto set irq say at the boot: or in modprobe.conf ?
> > > dont share interrupts, as a rule(if you can help it)... it usually leads
> > > to
> > > system instability and usually under load.
> > Quite well understand this point . Have heard it on this list many
> > times . And am doing my best NOT too .
> > > UBCD ...(www.ultimatebootcd.com). has some nice tools that can probe a
> > > system
> > > to give a second appinion on interrupt conflicts, ram and hard drive
> > > errors.....
> > > its my best tool for hardware problems..
> > IMO , The mirrors have the su??iest download schemes I have seen in
> > some time .\IMO
> > I have yet to burn that image but as soon as I do I'll boot it on that
> > piece of junk I bought for near next to nothing . Which is almost what
> > it is worth , Nothing .
> > Thank you for your input , Every bit helps . JimL
> Finally got that da??ed wcfxo to load on a irq by itself (*). Had to
> turn off the last item of the onbord devices the ether & buy an ether
> card to get connectivity . But even with the suggestion by 'Paul' to
> use a two line cord & finally using a singular irq , The config's I
> sent last time have not changed . The x100p/wcfxo combination see the
> line ringing (**) . But asterisk does NOT see it on the console nor
> does it pick up the line . Quite frustrating when everything should be
> ok per every example I've seen & still nothing positive to show for it .
> ANY suggestions/questions/... Please pipe up . Tia , JimL
For everybodies info , Make sure that there isn't an entry like ...
noload => chan_zap.so
in /etc/asterisk/modules.conf . That was what the problem was all
along . Tnx to all who helped . JimL
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
| Network Engineer | 3542 Broken Yoke Dr. | Give me Linux |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Billings , MT. 59105 | only on AXP |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
