there is no security risk, actually it reduces access. The bug meant that a [iaxtel] section had to be the last section in the file, otherwise it would be ignored. If you aren't having a problem with authenication in iax (people who have access but are getting rejected), you won't need the update.
> Mark, > > > The location of the "guest" / "iaxtel" section having to be at the end is, > > as it turns out, a configuration error on iaxtel. I hope to have it > > straightened out shortly. > > > > > > Ok but I fixed it. Just put the "guest" "section" in iax.conf all the way on > > > the end. > > > And right now it works for me. :) > > Since many are having a tough time with documentation, would it be possible > to add at least a few words with some of these explanations to give users a > slight clue (more then "...an error...") so we have some idea as to > whether it might be important to react to cvs updates (etc)? > > Just a simple sentence like 'should have no effect on anyone other then > those experiencing new iax link issues' would have an entirely different > impact then 'the error may allow anomymous access to the full dialplan' > would be nice. > > Rich > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
