I mirrored it, it got SlashDoSed aparently. http://www.trxtel.com/transcoding.html
I left out the image of the application, however some key points from the article - my comments are in square brackets: The application only works with X1000 series graphics cards, and it only ever will. That's the only architecture with the necessary features to do GPU-accelerated video transcoding well. That's right; we're look at a minimum of 5-to-1 speed improvement over CPU transcoding speed. That's just huge. [That is with video - audio should be somewhat easier for it to do, and one issue is at what point is it slower than using the host cpu, 3 channels? 5? 20?] Every manufacturer of video transcoding software should be absolutely beating down a path to ATI's door right about now, figuring out how it can add that "GPU acceleration" checkbox to its application as quickly as possible. We mean Nero, Microsoft, Apple, Cyberlink, Adobe, and every other firm that makes a video-encoding application. Given how many countless man-hours are spent trying to get a 20% or 30% boost in encoding performance, the prospect of encoding on the GPU should have a bunch of engineers salivating. [it doesnt do audio yet, but that is alledgly a planned feature] -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
