On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Mark Hulber wrote:
> Ok. It seems my calls are completing ok.
>
> MARK.
>
> Rich Adamson wrote:
> > Steve committed the source code changes to cvs-head to display these
> > numbers, and I believe he was working on jitterbuffer or codec stuff.
> > He has since posted an item that he wished he would not have done that
> > as its generating lots of questions.
> >
> > His thought process was something along the lines that if too many
> > tasks are in the secheduler, then servicing the code he was playing
> > with might not occur in the time frames that one might expect. So he
> > dumped those lines of code in there to find out. Since there is no
> > other data, no one knows what those other scheduled tasks might be,
> > so there's no way to answer the question of 'what's going on'.
> >
> > Just ignore the item for now.
> >
> > Rich
Hi,
I'd like to understand what work is being queued.
Mark, do you:
have lots of defined iax2 peers
use a very low registration expiry (or does the peer?)
use the jitter buffer
use realtime
use switch stuff
Is there something in the call setup that might account for a long delay
(block). Are you using ENUM?
What does the dial statement look like?
Thanks,
Steve
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
