On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 10:17 -0800, Dan Austin wrote: > Indeed it is. At the time it was posted someone suggested that adding > an option to the codec selection process would be better, but no one > added the code (allow=ulaw:30,g729:40 type of thing). >
I think that is a better way to go so that you can tweak things specific for your system. Someone on DSL with PPPoE has to contend not only with ATM framing but also with PPPoE framing (6 bytes per packet iirc) and so on. Typically though if you are on DSL, especially with PPPoE you are a home user, and the calling volume should be low enough that you can tolerate a little inefficiency, if they are tuned for straight ATM that would prolly work best for the majority of people the majority of the time. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 http://www.sacaug.org/ Sacramento Asterisk Users Group
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
