I cannot understand why, why not use attended transfer then? On 11/14/05, Leif Neland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ---- Original Message ---- > From: "C F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 4:50 > PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with Cisco local conference and > hangup > > > Cisco 7960 gets a call from zap/1, hits conf to call out on zap/2, > > then hits join, after a while cisco hangsup, at which point zap/1 and > > zap/2 can still talk, shouldn't asterisk hangup on all three? > > That is the way I would prefer it to work. > Like an attended transfer. > > Leif > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
