I have some experience using the TE410p and spandsp. I think my max
concurrent rxfax has been about 16 or so on a single E1 on a single cpu
3.0Ghz P4. I expect that it could handle at least 30 concurrent faxes,
thereafter I think that the disk controller may start to impact performance.
My experience of txfax is that it is very sensitive to system load. When I
was testing things I was able to get no more than three concurrent instances
of txfax going on a system that was otherwise idle. If I was receiving a
fax at all via rxfax then I could reliably have no more than one instance of
txfax.
Craig
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ma Zhiyong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 9:21 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P and SPANDSP
Hi, All
Does any one has successful experience use te410p and spandsp together?
Could they work well with all 120 channels receive/send fax at the same
time?
My practice is that rxfax always get broken fax page.
Help!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
