On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:14:35PM +0100, Francesco Peeters wrote: > On Wed, November 30, 2005 12:28, Alejandro Vargas said: > > 2005/11/29, Francesco Peeters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Then add to a startup file like rc.local: > >> modprobe zaptel > >> modprobe zaphfc > >> ztcfg -vv > > > > I just made exactly as you sed: removed all bristuff, uncompressed it > > again, execuded download.sh, downloaded florz patch > > (zaphfc_0.3.0-PRE-1_florz-10.diff) and applied it, compiled zaphfc, > > cpied zaptel.conf to /etc and zapata.conf to /etc/asterisk, then: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaphfc]# modprobe zaphfc > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaphfc]# modprobe zaptel > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaphfc]# ztcfg -vv > > > > Wrong order: First zaptel, then zaphfc. Do an lsmod to verify both are > loaded before ztcfg
Why should it matter? (if you remove the automatic runs of ztcfg from modprobe.conf/modules.conf) ? And does it matter even if you do run ztcfg multiple times? I've heard all sorts of conflicting reports about this. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
