No, max we used is 30 channels. But according to voip-info its faster protocol because it offloads media processing to asterisk (which is a better choice I think) and only looks after H323 call setup.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 11:28 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323 Ok.. how many channels are you using? More than 100? Maybe it can be good only for 10 or 20 simultaneous connections... Isamar On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Boris Bakchiev wrote: > I like the chan_ooh323. > I like the idea of selfcontained H323 channel that doesn't rely external > libraries, often with specific versions that conflict with something _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
