What exactly do you mean by 'documented not to be implemented'? If you are referring to the fact it isn't implemented, yes I realise that. That's why I'm trying to get an idea for when these features will be. This isn't whining.
If you are however, stating they are designed this way and there's no plan to implement them, I'm wondering why there's such resistance to putting redundant features into Asterisk? -----Original Message----- From: Kevin P. Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 1:09 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SRV Lookups Douglas Garstang wrote: > I guess we can put that up there with the inability to share a common > Realtime database between Asterisk servers for SIP peers too... another > serious limitation. Would you like your money back? Please tell us where to send it and we'll get it right over to you. Whining about stuff that is not implemented (when it's clearly documented to not be implemented) does not do anyone any good, and it makes the rest of the community tend to ignore the remainder of whatever you have to say. This is a volunteer-driven open source project; people write and test what they feel like writing and testing. If you want something that is not implemented, you can 'influence' what someone feels like writing and testing in whatever way is suitable... but whining at them usually has the opposite effect. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
