Like what? I'm being very serious and firmly believe in what I said below.
What's your issue with it? I'd really like to know, seriously, because I just
can't understand why others don't have a problem with this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Totaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 12/20/2005 9:49 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: RE: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Subscriptions
I hope you are just having a breakdown and aren't normally like this.
>
> Well, I know I will be attacked for saying this, as cursed are those
who
> say anything bad about Asterisk, but for an application that is
> 'enterprise-grade' as Digium tourts, it has several flaws that IMHO
> disqualify it as 'enterprise-grade'. I mean, really, c'mon... think
about
> it... an application that doesn't support the use of a database for
common
> location/registration information is hardly 'enterprise-grade'. Just
off
> the top of my head, other disqualifiers would be:
>
> 1. SIP subscriptions are stored in memory and cleared when you do a
> 'reload'. So, if you make any configuration changes and 'reload' you
lose
> all your BLF lights. People take this stuff for granted and expect it
to
> work.
>
> 2. No common SIP registration information. Not even using realtime
with
> SIP users, which doesn't work, there's no way outside this to share
> location info between more than one (ie 'enterprise-grade') Asterisk
> systems.
>
> 3. The 'Dial' application seem to have very limited ability to be able
to
> determine what SIP response it gets back from a peer. "Not Found",
"Busy",
> "Moved" etc. I know Asterisk isn't a SIP proxy, but without the
ability to
> check the SIP message status in a dial, it makes redundancy very very
> difficult. Redundancy is normally an important part of
'enterprise-grade'.
> Without this, how do you get upstream redundancy? I have something
working
> right now, but it isn't pretty!
>
> 4. DNS SRV lookups aren't implemented properly. Another important part
of
> redundancy and 'enterprise-grade' software.
>
> Before you all go ripping my head off and defecating down my neck for
> saying anything bad about Asterisk (well CF can, I expect that), this
is
> just my opinion based on real world frustrations with Asterisk. These
are
> intended to be constructive criticisms.
>
> Maybe some from Digium will read this email and it will make a 0.001%
> contribution towards some of these things being fixed. Oh, and no... I
> can't switch to another solution. The decision was made above my head
to
> go with Asterisk. It's my job to make it do all that
'enterprise-grade'
> stuff.
>
> Doug.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue 12/20/2005 8:02 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Subscriptions
>
>
>
> > C F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/20/05, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Digium needs people like me, if they read this list that is.
> They sure
> > don't seem to be able to make real-world functionality
decisions
> on
> > their own.
> > >
> >
> > You are so right, how did we do without you the last few
> > years???????????
>
> By living on baked beans and cabbage.
>
> PaulH
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
