Mike Fedyk wrote:
With the current *RT release?
Yes. The crux of the issue that you can't have two servers responsible for updating the same records in the table, and that you can't have two servers both expected to react to changes in those records on an instantaneous basis (which is why you can't share the table across two active servers and expect both of them to be aware of where the peers are).
If the two servers service distinctly separate groups of endpoints, they can share the same table since they won't care about the other server's entries. If the two servers service the same endpoints but in an active/passive arrangement, that would also work.
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
