On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:57:47 +0100, Erwin de Raad wrote: >> >> You should be able to run SIP through m0n0wall quite happily - we have a >> number of client sites with SIP phones offsite which connect to the * >server >> behind a m0n0wall box. You'll need to allow 5060 (UDP) for SIP, then an >> appropriate port range (as definted in rtp.conf) for the RTP streams. >> >> You'll obviously also need to apply any QoS rules to both the SIP and RTP >> streams. >> > >Totally agree. I moved from Kerio WinRoute (claims to be SIP aware > not) to >Monowall and all SIP/NAT issues went away. >It doesn't do QoS but you can do bandwith/traffic shaping which also should >work fine. >
Surely there's something more to the truly SIP-aware device, such as the Ingate IX66, that merits their use in some specific circumstances? I truly love my m0n0wall. It's been 100% solid and totally managable, even for a relative novice such as myself. I don't generally have problems with getting the mechanics of SIP setup through m0n0. But I thought that there must be some advantage to the proxy services provided in SIP aware devices or they simply wouldn't exist. I know that I can stay with m0n0. The question still stands; are there circumstances when something more is required? Would something be gained by such a migration. Michael -- Michael Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Product Specialist www.pixelpower.com Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] o713-861-4005 o800-905-6412 c713-201-1262 fwd 54245 _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
