Remco Barende wrote:
- even if * will do the software conversion will the quality of the channel remain sufficient to provide rock solid faxing. Maybe the channel bank is considerably better than the sipura's I have been using so far and there would be no ethernet involved.
There will be far less latency and no jitter to speak of doing the ulaw/alaw conversion, unlike going over the LAN.
- are there any T1 channel banks that support alaw or would I be forced to either buy an E1 channel bank or use a legacy PBX as channel bank
I doubt you will find a T1 channel bank that supports alaw companding.
- who decides which encoding is used, zaptel or the channelbank (in other words, if a T1 channel bank would support alaw, can I force alaw only to guarantee native bridging?
The other device decides; Asterisk/Zaptel can be configured for either companding method on any channel.
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
