On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 14:33 +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote: > > On 01/31/06 14:24 Tzafrir Cohen said the following: > > 1. FreeBSD can run Linux binaries, IIRC. Have you tried the Linux > > version? > > nothing beats a native version, no ?
FBSD linux stuff isnt really that different from native. There are some symantic differences but not a lot in terms of performance. Because the systems are close enough its mapping stuff more than creating a virtual machine. Now, it does require kernel stuff to support the linux binaries, so there is that issue. Most likely it wouldnt have to be ported, and if so it should be fairly trivial to do. Its more a matter of recompiling, and there are a lot of groups/individuals that dont like to do that for every BSD variant... If all you have is the linux binary you may want to try that and plead and beg for a fbsd version, but at least you would have something :) -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 http://www.sacaug.org/ Sacramento Asterisk Users Group
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
