On Friday 10 February 2006 14:22, Noah Miller wrote: > We've never bothered with Shared line appearances. I've pretty much > assumed they are only good for emulating a key system. For us it would be > more of a hindrance than a feature, as only our receptionists are ever > interested in taking calls from the main line (everyone else is DID). We > just use our multiple line appearances to allow our users to take multiple > calls. Sort of an advanced, visually-driven call-waiting.
*nods* -- and based on what others are saying, Asterisk's SIP stack does not really work with shared line appearances anyway. A classic case of me making things more complicated than they need to be. :-) > > I haven't even started to play with the mini browser; that looks like it > > is going to have some serious potential, too. > Does the minibrowser work on the 500's? I though it was only on the 600 > series. Hmm... that explains why the one set of config files I have has the "home" URL defined as "http://dont.you.wish.you.had.an.ip601.hehe/";. Thanks for the input, everyone. I need to digest this information into a "Quick and Easy setup of a Polycom IP501" for the wiki. -A. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
