On 1/23/06, Ira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 05:06 AM 01/23/2006, you wrote: > >http://asteriskdocs.org deserves all mentions it receives and the > > Though you really should mention that it's a 1.0 document and trying > to make a 1.2 installation work using that book is somewhat futile.
That's incorrect as the book was written for 1.2. Old documentation was written for 1.0 (as there was no 1.2 work going on at that time). Thanks, Leif Madsen. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
