I would recommend that you look at the Pika Technologies Daytona MM board. It has onboard DSP and onboard analog bridging taking up much less horsepower. Please contact me off-list if you would like more information.
Bill Hunt Stroudwater Contact Point 207 347 8080 x219 877 870 1234 Toll Free www.stroudwater.com "Realize the Value of Customer Contact!"TM This e-mail is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any duplication, dissemination, action taken in reliance upon, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may violate applicable law. If this e-mail has been received in error, please notify the sender and delete the information from your system. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Florell Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:39 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Aasterisk large-scale deployment w/analog phones Hello, If you are doing that many analog extensions you might want to consider 4 channelbanks and a quad T1 card instead(or two 2-port cards in two servers). Four TDM24XX cards will draw a whole lot of power and would be much harder to replace than an exterior channelbank if something goes wrong with one of them. Cost should be about the same overall(depending on which channelbanks you buy), except you will be able to use a much smaller server case with the quad T1 card. The most we have done is two channelbanks off of a quad T1 card in a single machine and it works just fine. MATT--- On 2/15/06, maka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello, > > I am planning a fairly large hotel VoIP system, using analog phones. It will > consist of about 100 analog phones, that must have access to a VoIP server. > I am considering an option to use a couple of asterisk boxes, bundled with a > total of four TDM2460E cards, and one TDM2451E card. > > Has anyone on this list done something similar? It would be great to hear > some comments regarding a smilar setuyp/planning - Do you think is it better > to distribute resources among multiple (more than two), lower-port-density > asterisk servers? Or is it better to use a channelbank for that purpose? > > Cheers > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
