Colin Anderson a écrit :
It's stupid. Don't ever connect 2 different building with copper.
Just wait until you get some kind of lightening hit or electrical
fault, but make sure you are no where near it. Use fibre.
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, the conduit for the provisioning of the
new building is unsuitable for fibre (too many sharp bends) and we can't
core out the concrete and put in a new conduit because of obstacles in the
way that make laying new conduit impractical, so we are stuck with
(existing) copper. We already have copper-to-copper connections of different
types (electrical, security etc) between the buildings so a lightning strike
is going to hose us no matter what.
That aside, does anyone have opinions on my original question as to the
suitability of bonded links for VoIP?
You might have a little bit of jitter, but that's what jitter buffer is
all about. IMHO it would be fine for VoIP but as it has been pointed on
the list it would be wise to prioritize correctly both ends of your
aggregated link.
PS: What about Wifi for your link? With a couple of well placed
high-gain outdoor antennas you could cover the distance and have similar
throughput... It could be significantly cheaper too!
Cheers,
Jean-Michel.
--
Jean-Michel Hiver - http://ykoz.net/
Découvrez la Réunion des Technologies IP & Telecom
TEL: +262 (0)262 55 03 98 - RCS 434 273 330 SAINT PIERRE
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
