|
way to go Matt!
All,
Just a quick update on our progress with the RAM disk
solution for digitally recording large numbers of calls via Monitor. We
are currently recording approximately 80 - 100 concurrent calls to the PCM
format on our production server. We also have over 220 dynamic agents
logged into 10 queues handling calls across 4 offices (1 local, 3
remote). All of our calls are SIP to SIP (a Cisco AS5400 terminates our
Ts) using the u-Law codec and we do no transcoding or DSP on the Asterisk
box. Yesterday, a total of over 8300 calls were handled. The box
is running roughly 77% - 80% idle.
As we add more clients to the box,
I'll update the list with the results.
For more details of our setup
see here <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.asterisk.user/118497>
and here <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-October/127919.html>.
Matthew
Roth
InterMedia Marketing Solutions
Software Engineer and Systems
Developer
Ron McCarthy wrote:
Also, SATA on a onboard SATA card will eat more CPU then a SCSI
system. Are you running software RAID by chance with your SATA? SCSI or SCSI
Raid will not each CPU near as much since the HBA does all the work and does
tie up the CPU with all its I/O's. We have successfulyl recorded 5+ calls at
a time via dual xeon 3.0 with 10K SCSI drives in RAID-5 with no issuses
running about 30 PRI channels and anywhere from 50-75 SIP channels, all with
g729 encoding.
Hope this helps!
Ron
On 3/2/06, Anton
Krall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Yep,
I tried it and indeed, it lowers cpu usage, so I switched from wav
to
gsm format and Im thinking about doing the ramdisk solution for
recording...
Sounds like a good
move?
|
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
